People will die because of this. And to be very clear, they’re not doing this to protect the 2nd Amendment. They’re doing it to protect the primacy of property rights. That’s why so many millions of $ were spent getting them onto the Court to begin with. bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-cana…

Supreme Court ruling expands US gun rights

The major decision by the highest court is expected to allow more people to carry guns legally.

bbc.co.uk
502
71
88
311
Replying to @Timcast
Disingenuous interpretation:)

Jun 23, 2022 · 4:31 PM UTC

51
1
2
22
Replying to @marwilliamson @Timcast
It's literally what you said. L I T E R A L L Y
21
Replying to @marwilliamson @Timcast
Saying "people will die" is also totally disingenuous. People are tired of tyrannical leftist manipulation.
1
93
Replying to @marwilliamson @Timcast
Ever think that maybe…you’re wrong?
Replying to @marwilliamson @Timcast
No it isn't, it's exactly what you said. But you don't care about Americans who need to protect themselves, you live in a safe bubble.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @Timcast
It’s literally an exact true interpretation. The Supreme Court didn’t give people the immediate right to concealed carry. All it did was reinforce that states MUST issue permits if all the criteria is met. “May” issue states were blocking almost all permits W/O reason.
Replying to @marwilliamson @Timcast
Replying to @marwilliamson @Timcast
You self reflected?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @Timcast
“ People will die because of this.” The “this” that you refer to is a ruling on gun permitting. Seems like his interpretation is pretty straightforward. What other “this” were you referring to?
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @Timcast
He asked a question
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @Timcast
Woman who makes hyperbolic statement accuses man of disingenuous interpretation.
3
Load more