People will die because of this. And to be very clear, they’re not doing this to protect the 2nd Amendment. They’re doing it to protect the primacy of property rights. That’s why so many millions of $ were spent getting them onto the Court to begin with. bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-cana…

Jun 23, 2022 · 2:52 PM UTC

502
71
88
311
Replying to @marwilliamson
Property Rights is just as good of a reason as 2A Rights to overturn oppressive legislation.
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
people will die because of medical malpractice, should we ban hospitals?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Go tell that to a scared coed being stalked or a single mom living in a bad neighborhood. You clearly know absolutely nothing about guns or gun laws and formulate opinions based on "thing bad" mentality. Do better.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Where's the outrage over Fetanyl?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Really? So you didn't bother to read the Supreme Court decision did you. Or did you not understand it? The decisions didn't say a single word about "the primacy of property rights." It did, however, say an awful lot about the Constitution and the right to self defense.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I can't imagine why you are so against our basic rights. The problem is most likely you're privileged and have no clue what's it's like to live without rights. Take a vaca to a small Cuban town and then let's talk
Replying to @marwilliamson
What's wrong with property rights? My home is my castle, and I have the right to defend it from those trying to take it.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Look, sweetie, people died because some coward cops wouldn't turn a door knob. You don't take away the rights of innocent people because of that.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
If you are more worried about this decision then you are about fentanyl overdose (which is the number one killer of our kids), then you need to do some serious self reflection.