People will die because of this. And to be very clear, they’re not doing this to protect the 2nd Amendment. They’re doing it to protect the primacy of property rights. That’s why so many millions of $ were spent getting them onto the Court to begin with. bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-cana…

Jun 23, 2022 · 2:52 PM UTC

502
71
88
311
Replying to @marwilliamson
Shall. Not. Be. Infringed.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Lives will be saved because of this.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Property rights are human rights, and only rights derived from property rights are logically consistent. If only "the primacy of property rights" was more consistently upheld, we'd live in a more moral, just world.
3
18
173
Replying to @marwilliamson
People die when pur rights are restricted. Not the other way around
Replying to @marwilliamson
This ruling changes NY from "may issue" (red) to "shall issue" (blue). The vast majority of states are already there, or the even more permissive constitutional carry (green). Is your argument that NY will become as violent as . . . Idaho?
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
People will die without this. To be very clear, the socialist soft-on-crime policies brought us here.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Are you super mad that you can't take people's stuff?
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
First claim is probably false. Second claim is certainly false.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Los Angeles: The LAPD is asking for the public's assistance in identifying a black male suspect who randomly beat an Asian victim unconscious in Koreatown on June 21 around 1:30 pm. The suspect threatened a bystander who intervened: lapdonline.org/newsroom/man-… #StopAsianHate