Nobody needs an AR-15 or an AK-47 for “self-defense.”
282
179
31
1,684
With all due respect, I'll be the one to make the choice of what tool I choose to defend my home and family from. When it comes to my family and livelihood, you are correct I want the odds stacked in my favor as much as possible.
13
2
1
42
Yes we would like the odds that children will be safe in school to be stacked in their favor as well. And we will make that choice.
13
1
43
Replying to @MichaelSkadoosh
There is nothing in the Constitution that says you’re at “liberty” to have an AR 15 or an AK 47. That nonsense is flying with fewer & fewer people & I will open my mouth when I please. You wanna talk 2nd amendment? How bout the 1st? Not to mention that it’s my Twitter account lol

May 31, 2022 · 5:41 AM UTC

6
10
Replying to @marwilliamson @MichaelSkadoosh
The right to keep and bear arms is a right. The purpose of the right is to protect the right to life, liberty and property. As time advances... weapons will advance. As long as there are tyrants and criminals there will be the need for weapons powerful enough to stop them. -VJ
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @MichaelSkadoosh
What do you know about the calibers of those weapons? What is your formal experience and history with handeling them? Any gun owner can tell you there are way more impactful calibers than the 223/556 or 7.62…so I’ll wait
3
Replying to @marwilliamson @MichaelSkadoosh
Not surprised you'd think another citizen telling you to shut your mouth is an infringement on your 1st Amendment, given how poorly you interpreted the 2nd.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson @MichaelSkadoosh
How about the words "Shall not be infringed"?
5