Nobody needs an AR-15 or an AK-47 for “self-defense.”

May 31, 2022 · 3:36 AM UTC

282
179
31
1,683
Replying to @marwilliamson
This pregnant woman saved her husband and 11 year old daughter with an AR 15 from 2 home invaders with guns. When you're in that situation with determined home invaders/criminals, you want a gun that can hold even more ammo than the task requires. youtube.com/KY0uHl1tWXQ
2
1
8
Replying to @marwilliamson
Depends on whom one is defending oneself from 😉
Replying to @marwilliamson
No one NEEDS anything for home defence. We could all sit at home defenceless. But some of us choose the AR-15 for home defence because it's one of the most effective tools for the job.
6
Replying to @marwilliamson
So let’s say they are banned and nowhere to be found legally.. so now someone Gisele in with a 9mm and 2 clips and kills 8-9. What then ?? People will find a way
Replying to @marwilliamson
Didn't ask for your approval
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
That depends entirely on what I'm defending myself from. The instant someone says 'nobody' or 'everybody' they've usually invalidated their statement. Also, if you trust and follow your intuition you probably won't be in a situation that calls for violence.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Less Jerry Falwell More MLK
Replying to @marwilliamson
Marianne, model distinctions and classifications are meaningless. Unless we were to hunt down and remove all weapons beyond single or double shot long-guns, including those held by police, this sort of thing will keep happening.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
I disagree. They're so good for self defense that 19 cops won't challenge a single random kid who has one.
1
2
1
14
Replying to @marwilliamson
If a person cannot "defend themselves" with more traditional, non-semiautomatic, rifles/shotguns...they probably should be around ANY guns at all.
GIF