SCOTUS Citizens United decision continues to do irreparable harm to our democracy, allowing corporate and billionaire money time and time again to suppress the will of the people. Overriding the undue influence of money on our politics is the greatest moral imperative of our time

May 18, 2022 · 7:17 AM UTC

31
143
12
662
Replying to @marwilliamson
You could've voted for Hillary in 2016 & we wouldn't have this probably. She is probably the biggest champion for getting big dark money out of politics sine Citizens United was about HER. But you didn't so this is on you.
1
1
Um, I did vote for Hillary in 2016.
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Nah. No big deal. So the highest court in our land boasts a female misogynist and two sexual predators - one of whom's directly tied to the insurrection. Blah blah blah. Just another day in "Amerika."
1
0
Replying to @marwilliamson
Citizen's United will pale in comparison once these corrupt hacks gut #Roe.
0
Replying to @marwilliamson
Today, fifty-five percent of Americans believe the Supreme Court is “mainly motivated by politics” fifty-nine percent believe the Court is “too influenced by politics”;& a majority believes the “Supreme Court should be restructured in order to reduce the influence of politics.”
Replying to @marwilliamson
It's time for Congress and the president to ignore these very destructive opinions from #SCOTUS. They took the power to decide constitutional issues in a power grab. Let them stick to legal issues.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
“First of all, we need to pass a law and not only legislation but also a constitutional amendment of public funding for federal campaigns.” Marianne Williamson
2
1
12
0
Replying to @marwilliamson
Avoiding nuclear war is a greater moral imperative
Replying to @marwilliamson
100% agree. One of the ways we are able to do this permissionlessly is through the building and strengthening of the blockchain ecosystem creating one of the greatest transfers of wealth in our time -and- providing open access to equitable opportunity for all
Replying to @marwilliamson
How can a corporation be considered as a person?