Peaceful protest is not “force and intimidation.” They’re exercising a Constitutional right.
Marsha Blackburn says protesters outside Justices’ houses should all be arrested: “They should haul all these people down to police HQs, they should book them .. They’re trying to change the outcome of a SCOTUS decision, and they’re doing it by showing force and intimidation.”

May 11, 2022 · 2:27 PM UTC

77
85
16
564
Replying to @marwilliamson
Actually against the law... Maybe have them protest at your house
Replying to @marwilliamson
Think doing it at a judges home is illegal
Replying to @marwilliamson
“Force and intimidation”???? Did you see Jan 6th?
Replying to @marwilliamson
I don’t think it will change things, and here’s why
On protesting outside Justices’ homes 🧵 Sure, you have the constitutional right. But we just had some of the largest protests in history (Women’s March and George Floyd protests) and they had negligible or even worse results. There is a form of protest that has immense power /
Replying to @marwilliamson
A completely ineffectual constitutional right.
Replying to @marwilliamson
That or the guillotines. Which is it for politicians and lawmakers?
Replying to @marwilliamson
There's no constitutional right to intimidate judges to influence their ruling.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Really? Then arrest all those using the same to force all humans aged 5-18 to serve a sentence in a coed prison WHERE THEY TEACH CHILDREN SEX ACTS.
Replying to @marwilliamson
They don't have to be intimidating. The act of trying to influence the justices by their "peaceful protests" is overtly and objectively against the law. Imagine the same number of Proud Boys doing the exact same thing outside of Sotomayor's crib. Yep.
Replying to @marwilliamson
you can't protest at their residence