If we’re supporting Ukraine militarily but not simultaneously promoting whatever possibilities exist for an off-ramp, how are we not flirting with nuclear disaster?

May 11, 2022 · 5:28 AM UTC

141
143
17
1,033
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
I often don’t agree with you, but I agree now!
Replying to @marwilliamson
Meanwhile...
This tweet is unavailable
Replying to @marwilliamson
Most of our "assistance" is geared towards weaponry. This shows our purpose is to chase Putin screaming "we're the super power not u". Biden's spending close to $50 bn on UKR (a country 8k miles way). A covid-19 stimulus of less than $2 billion, we were told, was too much 🙄
2
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Good question
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Apparently WWIII is their solution to the climate crisis; get rid of billions of people and things can be normal again. Just look at what they are doing with Russia and China, opening more lands for drilling, getting rid of masks and social distancing measures, all adds up to
2
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
1
Replying to @marwilliamson @JohnnyLeRose
Putin is flirting with nuclear disaster. Not us.
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Right. And putting Trump administration policies back in place that made us energy independent, would be a good start. Then we wouldn’t have to beg countries including Russia to sell us oil. We wouldn’t be supporting Russia if we would drill.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
It's always better to do the right thing..appeasing murders, torturers, rapists is never the right thing....never
1
7
Load more