If we’re supporting Ukraine militarily but not simultaneously promoting whatever possibilities exist for an off-ramp, how are we not flirting with nuclear disaster?

May 11, 2022 · 5:28 AM UTC

141
143
17
1,033
Thank you. I didn’t vote for you but I respect this more than ANYTHING I have heard from @potus and the whole snake filled morass in DC. Both sides
Replying to @marwilliamson
Russia always flirts with nuclear disaster. That's their like, first go-to. It's how they've been getting away with this crap for the longest time.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
We are dangling the Ukranian people, tempting Putin to target them with his nuclear arsenal, and risking no harm to ourselves. It's what we do.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Nuclear disaster is the off ramp.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Ukraine is one big money laundering state.
Replying to @marwilliamson
1st, it’s not WE. I do not know a single American who voted for this trash. 2nd, it’s not “support” it’s a proxy war and US war pigs have been clear, this isn’t about Ukrainian “democracy,” it’s about harming Russia. They’ve all said it, and I know you heard them.
Replying to @marwilliamson
If anybody here wants to follow a well developed source on American foreign policy with Russia, I recommend @RadioFreeTom You can also look into @McFaul
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
We've been flirting with nuclear disaster every year since 1945. Over the years there were probably chances to un-flirt, but we didn't avail ourselves of those chances. Whatever we now do, good or bad, it will involve flirting some more, unless/until the world disarms.
Replying to @marwilliamson
A cool 40 billion straight to the military industrial complex to build weapons for Ukraine. In what possible way does this help the American people? Remember - we couldn't afford $47 billion for the BBB act to fight climate change here in US...
Replying to @marwilliamson
Unless you are advocating for a policy of capitulation for peace, the off-ramp is Putin taking his cardboard army and going home.