Barack Obama had a super majority, could have called for the codification of reproductive rights but it said “it wasn’t a legislative priority.” For God’s sake, it isn’t @SusanSarandon’s fault.

May 7, 2022 · 2:43 AM UTC

444
694
87
5,699
Susan Sarandon is the one who has so much glee about it. And in 2016 when Hillary Clinton brought up losing Roe Vs Wade and the SC, Bernie Sanders called Planned Parenthood the establishment and called abortion rights “a distraction.”
29
45
2
235
Cut the man some slack, he was busy drone bombing weddings and giving our taxes to bankers. It's hard to multitask.
3
8
I was told that in 2016, Roe wasn't enough of a concern to vote for Hillary. Those are the same people who looked like they were looking to hop on a ride to hale bop when they were crying for Bernie in Charlotte. Those are the people who voted for Jill Stein. They are you
9
14
1
57
Nope .
Replying to @HawaiiDelilah
Please let Marianne Williamson and all the other useful idiots know that there was no super majority for two years under Obama. msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show…
2
2
Again, this is wrong. Democrats had a solid majority (60 seats in 2008) in the senate for 72 days. They never had a super majority.
1
No president or congress has codified reproductive rights. BUT, Voting for Jill Stein = 3 conservative SCOTUS Justices.
1
4
“Well the first thing I’d do as President is sign the Freedom Of Choice Act.” Barack Obama
1
4
4
15
0
A super majority is 67. He had a 60 vote majority for less than 100 days, and it was in 2009 when the economy was in recovery from the free fall it took the summer before. Please. Sit down and recharge your crystals while the adults talk.
2
There's a majority today too. Remind us again why electing more Dems helps? Because right now it looks like their main job is driving us from covid upward wealth transfer to nuclear holocaust