A law telling a woman what she can and cannot do with her uterus is definitely government overreach.

May 3, 2022 · 4:27 PM UTC

116
167
16
1,300
Replying to @marwilliamson
Don’t remember you protesting when they tried to force vaccines on the populace. You and the dems weren’t pro freedom of choice then!
Replying to @marwilliamson
Violates autonomy too, a form of dominance that controls women's intimacy. Let's bar vasectomies, impedes procreation from the male side. As such, it's anti-life. Abortion ban favors certain religions, though "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion"
Replying to @marwilliamson
How did you feel about mandatory injections & discriminating against those who refused to be lab rats for Fauci?
Replying to @marwilliamson
You were fine with it when it goes in your favor of your thought process. Personally people can do what they want if the can live with their decision. But first option should be pregnancy avoidance.
Replying to @marwilliamson
It's not about the uterus. It's about the child inside that uterus. You are dehumanizing the conversation.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Once a woman allows another man to ejaculate inside of her and create a living being being she is now bound to take care of that living being until the until it can be taken care of by others if she doesn't want to any longer.
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Is it not disingenuous for women to insist on exclusivity in the abortion issue when the decision to have sex is a joint decision? This insistence is the reason that most men feel excluded from their responsibility in the predictable effects of sex with or without contraception
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
How come you Libtards weren’t protesting the mandated covid shot around the country
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Funny no one ever mentions mandatory vasectomy.
1