A law telling a woman what she can and cannot do with her uterus is definitely government overreach.

May 3, 2022 · 4:27 PM UTC

116
167
16
1,299
Replying to @marwilliamson
Only said the case was not supported by the law and the state's take the lead. Justice Bork and RBG said the same.. It was a bad decision years ago. Courts only rule on the law present not make laws
Replying to @marwilliamson
Men are knowingly injecting live sperm inside women’s bodies that have no immunity to their venom. What other disease by direct contamination causes such harm as fission? The men are immune to their own poison.
Replying to @marwilliamson
What about a law allowing one person to kill another?
Replying to @marwilliamson
But but I thought y'all said all women don't have uterus's see what happens when you all play these stupid ass word games...
Replying to @marwilliamson
I have an idea: let’s make a women’s movement ruling over male parts. Who joins?
Replying to @marwilliamson
What about a man’s uterus??
Replying to @marwilliamson
It’s wokeness in the most extreme sense
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
This makes no sense smh
Replying to @marwilliamson
A baby is it’s own body. We’re hoping to protect that. Deal.