Short of calling for violence, people should be able to say whatever they want to say and read whatever they want to read.

Apr 19, 2022 · 1:12 PM UTC

127
101
20
1,148
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Does this also apply to math books?
2
6
Replying to @marwilliamson
A-woman🦋 Especially if 'violence' is 'painful energy turned into attacking force' (aka PETI AF)... ...& verbal attacking-force (that minimizes, dehumanizes or demonizes another person), is part of the THREE 1a exceptions around violent speech (ie not protected)🙏🏾@GlennonDoyle
2
0
Replying to @marwilliamson
Personal responsibility; if you say something that leads to bad things happening, you are responsible. That is what is needed, not censorship.
2
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Absolutely. But, when somebody violates PRIVATE FREE ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY STANDARDS that are not protected under the Constitution then consequences with accountability can & should be implemented onto ordinary individuals..
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
seems so simple
1
1
15
Replying to @marwilliamson
They should. But if you want to use MY platform to do it you need to follow the rule I set for using MY platform. If you don't like MY rules, you are free to create YOUR OWN platform with YOUR OWN RULES.
4
6
Replying to @marwilliamson
yes. because calling for violence is essentially silencing others free speech.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes but you still have to be held accountable.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes, freedom isn't always pretty, but whatever power you give to censor your enemies will one day be used to censor you.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
No. In a sane society, speech rights are not absolute.
2
1
Load more