Joy Ann Reid asked Elizabeth Warren whether there wasn’t a “moral hazard” involved in cancelling the student debt. But the moral hazard was making the attainment of a higher education such a weight on the back of people simply trying to better themselves to begin with.

Apr 14, 2022 · 11:43 AM UTC

84
112
7
734
The "moral hazard" question is always - a.l.w.a.y.s. - reserved for the peons. But $$Trillions$$ for the banksters who brought the world economy to its knees? Nope, no moral hazard there!!!
Replying to @marwilliamson
I mean there definitely would be moral hazard involved on the question if the cancellation would be a one time event alone and if not what that would do to higher education cost?
2
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Two moral hazards talking to one another. What do you expect when two snakes meet? 🐍🐍
Replying to @marwilliamson
The question should be asked so the premise can be rebutted
Replying to @marwilliamson
I know I’m preaching to the choir here but that isn’t how Moral Hazard works. The risky behavior was taking out predatory loans at insane interest rates. That action has been completed. The people who are getting their debt forgiven aren’t going to college again.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
They have with premeditated intent robbed the American people of any representation since 1978 adding an abetting treason in pursuit of the WEFs global domination plans! Facts Matter. Don’t do the crime if your not willing to do the time!
Replying to @marwilliamson
Joy is a VERY shallow thinker as well as a mouthpiece for the Conservadems. She does have good outrage antics though😏🤦🏼‍♀️
Replying to @marwilliamson
BS…. The cost and implications of the loan weee known when inked. The moral hazard is shirking this responsibility on someone else. ….or getting a BS degree with no ROI. You make choices. You live with them. It’s called life.