Exactly.
Consultants are going to get paid a lot of money to help pretend the problem is more complicated than failing to pass extremely popular legislation after promising to do that.

Apr 11, 2022 · 2:08 PM UTC

10
8
93
Replying to @marwilliamson
What else were you all lied to about? 🤔
Replying to @marwilliamson
“Biden’s numbers with young voters took a staggering dive at the end of 2021, dipping lower than any Democratic President in decades” … POLITICO
Replying to @marwilliamson
almost like they shouldve held up infrastructure or military to get a deal on that stuff instead of letting it fall thru like a rock :/
Replying to @marwilliamson
jesusNoriega(97): ok no more politics please, thank you
Replying to @marwilliamson
The American Union of swing voters flips this model around, by writing the popular legislation first (end poverty, end mass incarceration, end the endless wars), and expecting Congress to pass it in October in exchange for votes in November. #VoteAU
Replying to @marwilliamson
You need the high paid consultants if you think the problem was not being progressive enough. That there should have been even more ridiculous bills (HR1, BBB, Jan 6th etc, to get rejected on the floor.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Printing trillions of $ doesn’t cause inflation. Males can get pregnant. Transgender athletes don’t have an advantage in sports. Closing pipelines, halting fracking, freezing drilling doesn’t increase gas prices. Climate change is deadly. Psychological warfare 👆
Replying to @marwilliamson
The problem is more complicated, most people have no idea about policy and they don’t care. The population votes on pure propaganda, and dems suck at that.