A wealth tax of 2% on over $50M & another 1% over $1B would never even be felt in the daily lives of those taxed. There is something so warped about trying to protect the wealth of those who already have so much, while voting to crush the opportunities of those who have so little

Mar 27, 2022 · 6:08 AM UTC

95
290
17
1,603
Replying to @marwilliamson
You Liberals are so delusional. Congress would just spend the extra money on war and lobbyists. #TaxationIsTheft
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
You’re no Dr. Jill Stein. You have no values, no morals. We see who you are. Get off of social media. It’s only downhill for you from here.
Replying to @marwilliamson
First, we don’t need more money going into D.C., we need less spending. I am not wealthy but I understand how unfair it is to take so much from someone simply because they have more than you.
Replying to @marwilliamson
You have no idea what you are talking about. They tried this wealth tax in France. It resulted in less tax revenue coming in due to wealthy people leaving France. Why don’t you just raise income tax for wealthy to 90% and kill all drive and innovation while you’re at it
Replying to @marwilliamson
"Billionaire" shouldn't even be a thing.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
this "wealth tax" nonsense is socialist bunkum designed to change people's thinking, and make them believe that anything perceived as "wealth" should be taxed and handed over to the government; ICYMI the income tax started at 1%
Replying to @marwilliamson
Is that per year, on net worth, on earnings, estimated value? How would this be structured?
Replying to @marwilliamson
“The pushback against overreach by capitalism is the most patriotic thing we can do.” Marianne Williamson
2
7
Replying to @marwilliamson
And what would government do with it? Everything they do makes things worse
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO TAX ASSETS AND ACCRUED WEALTH IS AN ASSSET. Please educate yourself.
1
Load more