Women’s History indeed repeats itself this month, as the questioning of Ketanji Brown Jackson is more like an Inquisition than a just hearing, and her responses are those of an elegant transcendent brilliant female patiently enduring the absurdity of such mediocre interlocutors.

Mar 22, 2022 · 8:09 PM UTC

50
69
4
418
Replying to @marwilliamson
Always the divisive one, Marianne. Why?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Remember what they did to judge k? Accusations of gang rape! This person is ok with letting out child rapist, who’s is fact. You ok with that?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Like that never happened to any males
Replying to @marwilliamson
Talk about casting pearls to swine!
Replying to @marwilliamson
Do you really want a pedophile sympathizer in the Supreme court? #ProtectTheChildren
Senator Hawley to Judge Jackson: "[Y]ou go on to say, 'sex offenders are truly shunned in our society.' I'm just trying to figure out, judge, is he the victim here?"
Replying to @marwilliamson
Asked if she reached out to any of the victims of a heroin trafficker, Ketanji Brown Jackson dismisses the question by saying “there were no victims” really??? Disqualify
Replying to @marwilliamson
Real life children get abused to make child porn Marianne!! Real kids ruined discarded. How is that okay???
Replying to @marwilliamson
Are you ok with lenient sentences for pedophiles?