No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. Dear God, we have gone insane.
The New York Times
 @nytimes
22 Mar 2022
Experts say a new generation of less destructive nuclear arms may make the prospect of a nuclear strike less unthinkable than it once was. nyti.ms/36iq0Tl

Mar 22, 2022 · 2:40 AM UTC

191
256
34
2,140
Replying to @marwilliamson
I have heard there are “tactical nuclear arms” that kill ppl yet don’t destroy buildings and don’t leave radiation. 🙏🏻s for peace & safety for Ukrainians - seems good to help civilians leave part of Ukraine for awhile.
5
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
"Less unthinkable" for who? Is the @NYT on the nuclear industry take or was that headline editor just a totally dope?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Demand cooperation with both Russia and China! Both Russia and China want to build the Bering Strait Tunnel high-speed rail project for a new paradigm of economic development, cooperation, and peace.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Finally! We agree on something!
Replying to @marwilliamson
so is that what Russia has? I dont think so. Where are the fallout shelters anyway. Since we are the richest country the world has ever seen, I can only assume they are filled to the brim with everything we need to survive the next thousand years.
8
18
Replying to @marwilliamson
Atomics! They use them in “Dune” Very effective Yeah we’re crazy people
Replying to @marwilliamson
Hiroshima was 15 kt. Largest Russian nuke is abiut 800 kt for reference. Very much NO.
8
Replying to @marwilliamson
Based on all empirical evidence, collectively we most certainly have.
Replying to @marwilliamson
....this has literally always been the case though The difference between tactical (small, used on the battlefield) and strategic (large, meant for state-on-state, anti-city attacks) nuclear weapons. And if Kyiv is nuked we still won't get directly involved
1
Load more