Suggesting we do nothing to support a country that is being ruthlessly invaded doesn't make you "anti-war."

Feb 26, 2022 · 10:40 PM UTC

1,291
642
357
5,934
Replying to @marwilliamson
I am anti-war, all wars, which are a rich man's/corporate game. Ukraine is unusual with history -- including the U.S. Government who has been propped up during and since the 2014 supposed revolution. It is funny how we tolerate in one moment, but not in another.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
So wanting war makes you antiwar? On brand.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Do u have suggestions that won't escalate the possibility of nuclear war?
Replying to @marwilliamson
That is not what the "anti-war" movement is suggesting. Take your logic, and what is the point of the Russian "anti-war" movement?
Replying to @marwilliamson
very true. america always has pure intentions and leaves countries better off than when they arrived.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes it does. I respect you but you are wrong. Ukraine will 100% lose without boots on the ground “world war II” style assistance from outside. Unlike wwii, both sides have nukes, so not an option. And only sending arms will just prolong the inevitable at the cost of more lives.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
We're being ruthlessly invaded by a deadly disease that our government got bored of dealing with. You've just been added to the menu. #EatTheRich
1