The bigger issue is not where the parties are different, but where they are way too much the same. Both represent a corporate-backed status quo, and the status quo will not disrupt itself. youtube.com/watch?v=6mBbw32W…

Jan 14, 2022 · 7:22 PM UTC

59
207
36
1,001
0
Replying to @marwilliamson
No checks and balances. Paid by lobbyists, ergo they act in their favor instead of the tax payers they represent.
Replying to @marwilliamson
100% agreed! Now it's a matter of spreading the word on *CONCRETE STEPS* to disrupt a system that's designed to maintain the status quo. And in my mind, that requires a populist movement focused on changing the incentives of elected officials.
1
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
In the best way possible—Marianne Williamson is creating quite a stir…
10
25
0
Replying to @marwilliamson
One more point: I support S.2747 - Freedom to Vote Act. I regret that it doesn't help the working class. It merely gives us the "freedom" to vote only for a GOP or Democratic presidential candidate who would be bought, paid for, and owned by Wall Street.
1
7
Replying to @marwilliamson
You may be right BUT you’re missing the moment and 1 side is WHOLY UNDEMOCRATIC and if we CONTINUE to sow distrust,fascist will takeover.Set aside your personal ambitions and FIGHT FOR OUR DEMOCRACY.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Please consider primary run against Biden in 2024.
1
2
1
21
Replying to @marwilliamson
By definition: ‘The status quo will not disrupt itself.’ 😷
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
She reminds me of Mr Howls wife
Replying to @marwilliamson
❤️❤️❤️ you thank you for being a voice of reason, love, empathy and wonderfulness!!!