This NYTimes report is based on “hidden Pentagon documents.” In what way is that different from the Assange reporting in 2010. Will the govt accuse NYTimes of espionage now, or is it “freedom of the press” if it’s them doing it?
After years of reporting — more than 1,300 hidden Pentagon documents, ground investigation at the sites of 100+ U.S. airstrikes in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, and scores of interviews — we present part 1 of THE CIVILIAN CASUALTY FILES: nytimes.com/interactive/2021…

Dec 19, 2021 · 4:09 PM UTC

36
426
25
1,279
The NYT asked permission before publishing. If you ask and play nice sometimes the teacher allows you to go out to the playfield.
2
1
Oh they’ll do no such thing. They know absolutely nothing threatening will come out of this revelation.
Hell, the NYT published the same documents Wikileaks did
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
What does hidden even mean hm? Does that that mean classified?
NYTimes is CIA vetted, whereas Assange isn't.
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
It is freedom of pro-government press.
1
The government coauthored the piece!
1
Only Australian journalists get that honour. We're not allowed to wield that much power.
7
Replying to @marwilliamson
NY Times isn't a shill for Russia.