This NYTimes report is based on “hidden Pentagon documents.” In what way is that different from the Assange reporting in 2010. Will the govt accuse NYTimes of espionage now, or is it “freedom of the press” if it’s them doing it?
After years of reporting — more than 1,300 hidden Pentagon documents, ground investigation at the sites of 100+ U.S. airstrikes in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, and scores of interviews — we present part 1 of THE CIVILIAN CASUALTY FILES: nytimes.com/interactive/2021…

Dec 19, 2021 · 4:09 PM UTC

36
426
25
1,279
The difference is media-made Russiagate, a line that media -- and the entire liberal establishment -- cannot cross.
2
NO, because NYT is operated by people who own the Government.
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
When loose lips sink ships.
Replying to @marwilliamson
NYTimes works for the deep state and Asange exposes it. NYTimes presstitutes will promote the propaganda that benefits the intelligence community, the elites, and the Democratic Party. They exist to protect the ruling class by manipulating the public into accepting it.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Where are all the anti-Assange people now? Maybe I just live in a bubble, but think it's a hopeful sign that none of the usual scumbags have risen from the underground to utter their propaganda. Presumably they know it'll no longer work.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Or Daniel Hale. He is sitting in prison right now for exposing these civilian deaths.
1
5
No. The civilian casualty death rate has been accepted into the American psyche and can now be monetized by the left as an ideological accessory for their cult.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Right! ... If it's a Major Corporation like the New York Times ... or the Washington Post ... etc ... then it would be the Establishment attacking the Establishment ... but if it's a small local newspaper ... or ... a small company like Wikileaks ... they don't stand a chance!
2