Abolishing slavery was a “radical reversal in federal policy”, women’s suffrage was a “radical reversal in federal policy.” We *need* some radical reversal in federal policy!
NEWS: As Dems plot filibuster reform to pass voting rights, Sinema says via spokesman she still supports keeping 60-vote threshold "to protect the country from repeated radical reversals in federal policy" politico.com/news/2021/12/15…

Dec 16, 2021 · 6:28 AM UTC

20
54
6
340
Replying to @marwilliamson
Sinema is right on this. What happens when those “radical reversals” become republican’s wet dreams?
Replying to @marwilliamson
I find her insufferable
Replying to @marwilliamson
I hope to see you as vocal on filibuster reform when Republicans are in power. Will you be?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Sinema is just pure evil.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Would be nice if they had gotten rid of the filibuster before Build Back Better, but okay.
Replying to @marwilliamson
The real reason for the "end" of Slavery was an economic one; slaves cost money to house, feed, cloth and guard. Capitalism solved this problem for the owners by making the slaves have to house, feed, cloth and guard themselves, thus, maximizing profit.
Replying to @marwilliamson
How about protecting voting rights.
Replying to @marwilliamson
There is NO current law nor proposed law that restricts a person's right to vote. These histrionics about presenting an ID when you vote are nothing more than partisan propaganda.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
HATE COMES FROM FEAR … THE HATERS ARE LOUD …BUT THEY HAVE NO POWER … THE ONLY POWER IS LOVE … MAJORITIES DON’T CHANGE ANYTHING … THE WORLD CHANGES BECAUSE OF MINORITIES … A Miraculous Christmas ... Marianne Williamson ... 12/14/21