No they were rioters who were setting a fire Rittenhouse tried to put out and they tried to kill him for it. They were not even protesting.
Marianne Williamson
 @marwilliamson
26 Oct 2021
According to the Constitution we have the *legal right to protest* (the people he killed were NOT looting); according to the dictionary people who kill people are called *murderers*: and the people they kill are called *victims*. This judge should be removed from the case.
1
4
1
17
Replying to @RegressiveBard
Untrue. No legitimate account has said that.

Oct 26, 2021 路 6:09 PM UTC

2
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
I do need to correct they might not have been arsonists themselves, but like many here that were, they were not local citizens but were the aggressors. The experts the court brings in will say the same. Some already have.
1
The whole protest body were not rsonists and maybe these weren't but they were violent. They chased him with weapons and tried to take his weapon. Rittenhouse was afraid for what they might do and did what he believed he had to.
Replying to @marwilliamson @RegressiveBard
Legitimate Marianne? So when legitimate source (like CNN I imagine you mean) came after you for your anti-vax stance, they were correct? Their attack was justified? They were truth bringers? We both know the truth. The fake news media needed to silence you by any means necessary
1
1