According to the Constitution we have the *legal right to protest* (the people he killed were NOT looting); according to the dictionary people who kill people are called *murderers*: and the people they kill are called *victims*. This judge should be removed from the case.
The judge in Kyle Rittenhouse's trial says lawyers cannot call the 2 people he killed "victims." Rittenhouse killed 2 people and wounded another with an AR-15 style weapon. The judge says "victim" is too "loaded" but will let lawyers call them "rioters, looters or arsonists."

Oct 26, 2021 · 5:07 PM UTC

71
208
21
1,192
Replying to @marwilliamson
According to the Constitution we have the *legal right to bear arms* (the people he killed were chasing him); according to the dictionary people who kill assailants are *defending themselves*: and the person being asailed is a *victim*. You should stop tweeting.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
SMDH! By his language it’s obvious where the judge’s biases lie. Tragic. We cannot have justice in a nation where judges are lockstep with an agenda determined to destroy the last vestiges of democracy as we careen into a grotesque oligarchy a lá Hunger Games… I’m grieving
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
He should be removed from all cases
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
They're playing with fire if they let this scumbag walk!
Replying to @marwilliamson
@marwilliamson you're typically pretty reasonable. If you don't see the Rittenhouse case as clear self defense, you obviously didn't watch the entire video. The New York Times called it obvious self defense. Please go back and watch the clips. This is a political witch hunt.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Have no idea who you are, but I do know you're delusional. I've seen the footage.
Replying to @marwilliamson
The first guy he shot I can't speak on, the second 2 where attacking him one with a skateboard one had a pistol.
Replying to @marwilliamson
We also have the legal right to defend ourselves you stupid c***.