According to the Constitution we have the *legal right to protest* (the people he killed were NOT looting); according to the dictionary people who kill people are called *murderers*: and the people they kill are called *victims*. This judge should be removed from the case.
The judge in Kyle Rittenhouse's trial says lawyers cannot call the 2 people he killed "victims." Rittenhouse killed 2 people and wounded another with an AR-15 style weapon. The judge says "victim" is too "loaded" but will let lawyers call them "rioters, looters or arsonists."

Oct 26, 2021 · 5:07 PM UTC

71
208
21
1,192
Replying to @marwilliamson
Exactly, and Alec Baldwin gets to walk free
Replying to @marwilliamson
You're against self protection? I saw the video. He defended himself from felons out to hurt him.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Watch the video
Replying to @marwilliamson
Her words are just as loaded & inflammatory, s/b 'protestors' &/or 'victims' to be used interchangeably. But then again, who in Wis redneck legal system is gonna smack down this judge? But it could result in mistrial if verdict is not guilty & she continues down this warpath.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Go touch orbs Marianne. You’re out of your depth.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Exactly. Let's name the judge. #wipolitics
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Kyle Rittenhouse is a Hero who did the job of the police by dropping 3 felons in one night.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Rittenhouse has already been pepper sprayed, had bombs & rocks thrown at him, was hit by a brick, kicked in the head & smashed w/ a skateboard when a convicted felon on probation, Gaige Grosskreutz, illegally carrying a gun runs up pointing the gun at his head. What would you do?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Don't be ridiculous. Both "murderer" and "victim" presuppose guilt, which is not consistent with having a trial.
5
14