Absolutely. And think what a different world it would be: a president who starting in 2000 would’ve been majorly focused on the environment, plus no war in Iraq.
Gore would have won if the Supreme Court hadn't stopped Florida from counting all the votes nymag.com/intelligencer/2021…

Sep 10, 2021 · 1:31 AM UTC

31
31
3
240
Replying to @marwilliamson
What an incredibly naive thing to say 🤦‍♂️ Gore was a neoliberal, just like Clinton and Obama. Dems and Repubs differ only at the edges. If Gore had won, the world would be exactly as it is today. Capitalism is the problem, not elections.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Dumb as a rock. Maybe dumber.
Replying to @marwilliamson
…”plus no war in Iraq” how do you figure..? 🤨 Both of these parties are pro war. It’s not like we went into Iraq only because the red team happened to have the presidency..
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Gore tried to score huge profits off of his environmental ideas, and he was a Bill Clinton democrat. However he may havehandled 9/11, it certainly would have been status quo.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
The 308,000 Democrats who voted for BUSH thought otherwise and apparently so did Gore since he truly never fought for the Presidency. Oh and 9/11 would have probably still happened and Iraq most certainly would have eventually. Just at a later date. OIL and hegemony rule the US.
Replying to @marwilliamson
The dude is rewriting actual history.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Democrats have to win BIG in order to win, if they’re even or just a slight ahead, Republicans find ways to win. Gore didn’t win big. Plus getting this country to spend less and balancing the budget didn’t help the poor, it helped the rich. The middle class shrunk under Clinton.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Honestly I stop and think that and then mention it to random people and we commiserate. Can't help myself.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Gore is also partially responsible ... Instead of ... FIGHTING TO THE END ... he choose to back off and concede ...
1
2