If Republicans were in charge and they were in this situation, they absolutely would get rid of the filibuster and pack the court. One party seems intent on undermining our democracy, and the other seems unwilling or unable to stop them.

Sep 4, 2021 · 6:50 PM UTC

247
535
58
3,363
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Funny, they were in charge in 2016 and didn't end the filibuster when the dems used it all the time.
Replying to @marwilliamson @LauraJedeed
We have 2 holdouts that prevent most action. It's very simple thinking to lump them all together.
1
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
The conflict is between the haves and the have-nots. This "party" thing is a purposeful illusion. By the way, you're one of the "haves" so it might make sense that you would be propagating said illusion.
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Republicans are in charge. It seems.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yeah,and the Democrats sure did treat Tulsi and Andrew well during the debates....oh wait!
Replying to @marwilliamson
“So join my corporate-owned Establishment party while we rig our primaries and push progressive candidates off of ballots! Democracy!!”
Replying to @marwilliamson
Should we begin referring to the Democratic Party as the Weimar ?
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
One party is intent on obeying all the rules, and the other party will gladly sh*t on them.
2
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
Unwilling to defy their masters. If this isn't obvious to everyone you are either dumber than table salt or just a shill. We as a free society have been hijacked. Capitalist Oligarchs run everything. We don't matter. Until we shut this down by any means needed it won't change
Replying to @marwilliamson @ninaturner
One party or 2 people? 🙄
Load more