Restrictive abortion laws like the one just passed in Texas will not lower the rate of abortions. It will simply mean rich women get safe abortions while poor women will go back to the days of unsafe, dangerous, sometimes even fatal procedures.

Sep 1, 2021 · 5:35 PM UTC

133
702
42
3,384
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
One could apply this to guns too
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
ALL restrictive laws have this very same impact on poorer peoples.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
It gives harassers and stalkers the opportunity to legally pursue their goals. This law gives abuse a pathway legally.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Not just rich women, you forgot the mistresses of these politicians when they get pregnant with their illegitimate child/ren. 100% they pay for the procedure in a heartbeat at the cost of the child's heartbeat.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Gagan Kumar @gkofkrishnomics
31 Aug 2021
In my view, education and medical should never be allowed to be for profit ventures. Both are basic human rights and making it commercial deprives the basic human dignity.
Replying to @marwilliamson
men gotta know when to PULL OUT, unlike Joe Biden. and all seriousness, if people wanna be hoes out there, wear a damn condom or get on the pill.
Replying to @marwilliamson
fact. if u see a pregnant woman in NYC, theres a better chance (56%) of her being on way to an abortion than an obgyn. fact. the black pop has basically flatlined the last 25yrs as a result of abortion on demand. just like margaret sanger wud have wanted it. eugenics & genocide
Replying to @marwilliamson
Absurdus @AdAltum
1 Sep 2021
Replying to @ZaidJilani
There were over a million and a half abortions a year in the US less than ten years after Roe v. Wade. The idea that a million and a half women a year would have been getting abortions illegally is clearly absurd.
Replying to @marwilliamson
siraj hashmi
 @SirajAHashmi
1 Sep 2021
oh, so when y’all wanna have babies, it’s “birthing people,” but as soon as that right to terminate the pregnancy is stripped away it’s “women’s rights.”
Replying to @marwilliamson
Restrictive laws don't work, you say? Go fucking figure.
1
Load more