If your house was on fire would you take an incremental approach to putting it out?

Aug 6, 2021 · 5:47 AM UTC

244
420
70
3,313
Replying to @marwilliamson
The best way to fight a fire is to 1) form an exploratory committee, 2) pay a consulting firm to draft a white paper on how government response to fire should be tempered by its effect on capital investments, 3) draft a compromise bill with Republicans, 4) let Republicans veto it
3
25
Replying to @marwilliamson
No. You do triage. You assess the situation as you fight the fire, focusing on key areas that can be saved, and areas that prevent further damage to the rest.
1
7
Replying to @marwilliamson
Should we continue voting for and supporting people who are PROVEN REPEATEDLY not to have real interest in putting out the fire?
1
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
only if i hated it and wanted to make it look like i was trying to save it
4
1
169
Replying to @marwilliamson
Would you also be completely in denial about it?
1
16
Replying to @marwilliamson
Whoa, hold your horses there. We need to establish a committee to investigate this accusation about a fire.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Marianne, our owners are letting our houses burn so they can collect the insurance money.
2
3
36
Replying to @marwilliamson
No way! I would take all possible measures, the first would be to phone 000
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes. That’s exactly how we put fires out.
Replying to @marwilliamson
"Look they have a plan to put it out; lets wait and see. What if we try to put it out and we fail; we'll be made fun of. Instead of risking a chance of running out of our unlimited supply of water, lets invest our money into a fire extinguisher corp." Also: 'trump's fault"
2
9