If your house was on fire would you take an incremental approach to putting it out?

Aug 6, 2021 · 5:47 AM UTC

244
420
70
3,313
Replying to @marwilliamson
No. Would you vote for the people who propose it?
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Maybe the plutocracy shorted the world so when it’s destroyed they stand to make huge profits.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Only if the fire department was owned by pyromaniacs
Replying to @marwilliamson
It's unfair on the parts of my house that already burned down to put out the fire now
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
You voted for the guy that lit it on fire… and so did millions of more idiots
Replying to @marwilliamson
Unfortunately the head of the household the living room hogging the TV remote plans on dieing of old age before the fire gets to him.
Replying to @marwilliamson
First I would demand that the fire department prove it’s in fire, then I’d ignore them because they’re part of “the government” and I’m not a sheep who believes anything the government says.
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
The problem is that it's no their house that is on fire, so they are fine with incrementalism.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Peopl generally don't give the arsonist keys and lock codes to the house they set fire.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
If you were paid off , you set fire to it to cash in - us congress is cheap $