If your house was on fire would you take an incremental approach to putting it out?

Aug 6, 2021 · 5:47 AM UTC

244
420
70
3,313
Replying to @marwilliamson
The proper analogy would be. Your house is on fire here's some water. I want more water so I'll take no water.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
I'd tell my idiot family to stop lighting the curtains on fire.
Replying to @marwilliamson
No so why were you supporting @CoriBush theatrics instead of calling her out!? Can’t have it both ways
Replying to @marwilliamson
If my house is on fire, I am in a dire situation. If my house has burnt down, I can move from grief to action. Our house has burnt down.
Replying to @marwilliamson
That's what the fire department does.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I wouldn't approach it, but I would incrementally run away.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
A reminder, Marianne: Socialism is the fire department, paid by the community, putting out your fire without asking questions. Capitalism is the insurance company coming in and telling you you're not covered.
6
Replying to @marwilliamson
For sure, as that is the pragmatic approach. By messin' about, and waiting for an unspecified date to extinguish the fire, the fire will simply grow weaker, while our urge to do something grows stronger - and by the time the house is completely burnt down, I might tweet about it
1
And while the planet burns up, nothing is being done. It is ecocide. We must stop extracting, refining and using fossil fuels immediately to survive. All U.S. wars and our military's massive pollution must end.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Humans are delusional if they think we are going to stop this. There was an action movie about this kind of thing but who needs a movie when we can just live the horror? theguardian.com/environment/…
3