This evening, Facebook suspended my Facebook account and the accounts of several people associated with Cybersecurity for Democracy, our team at NYU. This has the effect of cutting off our access to Facebook's Ad Library data, as well as Crowdtangle. 1/4
257
4,993
782
11,031
Yes. The same happened to me. I am a professor and scheduled a LIVe to discuss the growth of white supremacist groups. They shut down my biz account, my personal account & my meditation account. I asked them review. 4,5,6 times, to no avail. This is wrong. For so many reasons,
31
213
15
1,138
In what way can we build an effective opposition to this? Does anyone know?

Aug 5, 2021 · 2:50 PM UTC

23
2
11
In New Jersey we’re looking to elect Diane Allen as Lieutenant Governor. That will help NJ, women, animals and all citizens. Her ticket comes with Jack. #JackAndDiane. Even Democrats who’ve had enough of this crazy are Voting for Jack and Diane on November 2nd 🗳 🌟 #NJ
#9,,human person. I am not a bot. I am an American citizen. Zuck created FB precisely becuz of the rights & privileges of U.S. -to operate as if he has no responsibility to the users is un-democratic. To have zero accountability is un-democratic. To have no system is place to
#10 address what their 'bots' are picking up, is un-democratic. FB is not democratic, bt is a platform of greed. Z & S are deluded + unable to recognize the duplicity of how they are running FB. The seduction of profit has elevated their sense of self-importance along with the
#18 and political pressure comes to bear upon Zuck, he will continue to steer FB in the direction he deems is best for his company. The Board he set up is far from agile. The Board is far from effective, & Zuck is operating as if he is untouchable. Political will. Public outcry.
#1: An important question.There must be a groundswell of intolerance for the unilateral power that FB exercises at this time. Political pressure to establish some form of regulation as Zuck is operating without ANY accountability to millions of ppl. If he believes in DEMOCRACY,
#2, then he needs to conduct FB as if he understands democracy. When I requested a review, there needs to be a review. When they state a disabled site can be appealed, then they must have a REAL appeals system. And when they remove pages that are not associated with a post that
#4, has been picked up by their 'bots' who are targeted for offending persons + sites which indeed do violate the rules of appropriate behavior, this must be justified. So far, FB has not responded to any of my questions. AS it was their analytics programs+ possibly some form of
#5, AI programming that picked up my mention of conspiracy groups, white supremacist groups, etc. there was not CONTEXT. To simply review my hx would reveal who I am. I am a professor. That can be verified. I have provided educational LIVES many times. My posts cover both
#6 domestic & international politics issues. But to remove my Meditation page? Really? Then my personal page which did not have anything bt chatty interactions with my friends. Under what provisions & powers does FB have this right if indeed Zuck believes in democracy? The
#8...the conduct of both Zuck & Sandberg is CAPITALISTIC, not democratic. The operational systems are for their benefit, not for their users. I appealed. I sent a copy of an ID as their autosystem demanded. Still, not response. This is wrong. Democracy upholds the rights of the