If progressives in Congress aren’t standing up for the likes of Julian Assange and @SDonziger then I’m not sure why they’re called progressives. If freedom of the press & the ability of corporations to prosecute private individuals doesn’t get you riled up then why are you there?

Jul 7, 2021 · 2:15 PM UTC

68
308
30
1,242
Here it comes! Trump goes after Big Tech! 🍿
Democrats are not "progressives", that should be obvious to you by this point.
There are NO political progressives in Congress, as the record shows. Dems just adopted that word some years ago for advertising purposes, appeals to many of the politically ignorant.
For MSM, anyone left of a corporatist is a 'progressive' .. lol #blueWaveToNowhere
Julian Assange is a Russian asset and a rapist
They exposed themselves long ago on FTV. They campaigned "left" only to vote "centrist" and "right" like all Democrats do. They all proved that candidates cannot be trusted and as such votes should be withheld until they make concrete promises that are hard to back of on.
They're here to distract from those issues and ensure no progress is made.
1
Sheesh Marianne no disrespect but the so called progressives in Congress are progressive in name only; we are judged by our actions;actions speak louder than words;all their cleverly crafted tweets designed to give the ILLUSION of working are not a substitute for substantive work
Because they are progressive. Freedom of speech, freedom of press and all those other pesky ideas are so 20th century😁