This is an important interview. I know it from experience: the so-called liberal media decides the (DNC) storyline they want to push & goes to great lengths to peripheralize anyone or anything offering a different perspective. We need real journalists, not party hacks.
Replying to @ggreenwald
Genuinely thrilled to appear on the debut show of @krystalball & @esaagar's new program after leaving The Hill, "Breaking Points." We discussed @brianstelter's unprecedentedly sycophantic CNN "interview" of Jen Psaki & the state of journalism generally: youtube.com/watch?v=3VTb8FLn…
55
82
11
566
You can make this point without Greenwald’s help, ma’am
3
20
Replying to @Hoovermensch
People have developed this weird attitude, at least it feels weird to me, that we only listen to the views of someone who agrees with us about everything. I don’t always agree with GG but that doesn’t mean I won’t listen to his views. Here he’s saying something very important.

Jun 9, 2021 · 3:16 PM UTC

11
2
2
58
This is your opinion based on your shared white privilege with him... the minorities in this country, cannot afford to sit and listen to this type of oppressor/aggressor. In order to survive we must ignore him and not give him a platform. You can't reason with a fanatic...
No, he’s a lying propagandist not some one we don’t agree with. Big difference lady.
And he’s highlighting Breaking Points ( the old Rising ) which is independent media at its best because they not only allow a space to disagree they encourage it.
1
6
No denying your capacity to recognize weirdness
Useful idiots can’t get past an out group messenger. They remain in the bubble.
1
But you can’t just take this one comment and look at it in a vacuum. He says the most heinous and hateful things, many times out and out lies, and as someone who touts positivity I’m surprised you are helping to boost him in any way. Or maybe you’re not as “positive” as you say.
1
3
Only if you want to hear the Russian Putin party line….
Replying to @marwilliamson
Sure, and I’ve made a point of listening to those I don’t agree with. For a lot of us, GG was one of the first people with contrary views that genuinely seemed worth listening to. But he’s tanked his own credibility by becoming a contrarian seemingly without principle.
1
9
Yeah, give us who's funding those views now that Pierre isn't, first. People have developed this idea that if you're popular, you get a pass for being abhorrent most of the time. And Glenn blocks half of Twitter, so maybe he should take your advice
2