nitter
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
4 May 2021
Protecting a patent is not as important as protecting a child.
May 4, 2021 · 2:09 PM UTC
72
313
28
3,610
Civic-minded Misanthrope
@chad_effortless
4 May 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
Releasing the intellectual property means that quality cannot be regulated, which could be disastrous.
4
Akhil
@akhil_oldsoul
4 May 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
sadly it depends on the color of the child. black and brown lives matter.
Steve- living in dystopian times
@abetterworld98
4 May 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
Unfortunately pharma owns the politicians like the military industrial complex.
12
Sandy Fisher
@sandyjfisher
4 May 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
“Whenever economic, social, or political policy in this country is passed, there should be an uprising of citizens saying, ‘Now tell me what about the babies...How does that affect the children?” Marianne Williamson
3
13
忍者の神 Marxist-Yeagerist ⌬
@delmoi
4 May 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
Joe Biden said the same thing - when he was running for office.
nitter.vloup.ch/i/status/1389349…
1
11
DUSTY CAPONE
@DustyCapone
4 May 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
U sure?
Zen Honeycutt
@zenhoneycutt
7 May 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
We feel the same way about patented GMO food and pesticides!
3
HanksLuncheonette
@HankTheReal
4 May 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
@kthalps
What if the patent is to a new type of child??? BOOM! Checkmate
Celan Bryant (CB)
@celanbryant
20 May 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
Unless they're in Palestine.
Load more