The US government didn’t put a price tag on how much it was willing to pay to defeat Hitler, and it shouldn’t put a price tag on how much it’s willing to pay to mitigate climate change. Money should not be the determining factor in defeating an existential threat.

Apr 5, 2021 · 2:30 PM UTC

96
242
21
1,646
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Money ain’t a factor when bombing or giving tax cuts to the elites, why the hell is it an issue when it comes to stopping pollution and cleaning the environment?
Replying to @marwilliamson
We should have a public debate with scientists from both sides of 'climate science' and have the public be the judge. It should be widely televised.
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Earth has been in a Global Warming Cycle since 1850, and they usually last 200 to 600 years.
5
7
Replying to @marwilliamson
It's like owning a home and your roof needs to get repaired, you have the money but some how you are debating on replacing the roof.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Lmao where is climate changes bunker? Let's go get him!
Replying to @marwilliamson
As long as much of our economy is focused on the fossil fuel and military industries no effort to address the #ClimateCrisis will suffice. This past year we all made sacrifices but that it was not enough gives perspective to how much we need to really do nature.com/articles/d41586-0…
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Maybe, if human-caused warming really were a crisis, but it isn't. Not even close. Scientific consensus doesn't agree it's noticeable or even slightly dangerous. Most warming is less severe cold. #ClimateAction has tiny temp effect. bit.ly/CoFa bit.ly/CPP38
Replying to @marwilliamson
Nothing like comparing Hitler to the environment.
Replying to @marwilliamson
The communists mostly defeated that right-wing regime, but your point is good.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Sure seems like there have been a lot of existential threats lately though. Perhaps we shouldn't have used so much capital on so many less important ones. 🤷
1
Load more