The US government didn’t put a price tag on how much it was willing to pay to defeat Hitler, and it shouldn’t put a price tag on how much it’s willing to pay to mitigate climate change. Money should not be the determining factor in defeating an existential threat.

Apr 5, 2021 · 2:30 PM UTC

96
242
21
1,646
Replying to @marwilliamson
Please stop
1
1
Since it’s my Twitter page, shouldn’t you be the one to stop?
1
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
The US wasn’t willing to fight Hitler until it sufficiently profited from selling weapons to both sides. 😒 also: USSR defeated Hitler.
5
1
25
Not true. And we defeated him together, along with European allies as well.
3
10
more replies
Replying to @marwilliamson
Sometimes you say stupid things.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Are you ok? Did you bump your head? How the FUCK can you compare Hitler to global warmin, I mean global coolin, I mean climate change? (sorry been a live since the 80s. I can't remember what y'all are calling it now. Also, wasn't the Ozone layer supposed to be totally gone by now
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson
“An amoral economic system leads to immoral consequences.” Marianne Williamson
4
8
0
Replying to @marwilliamson
The US government also did this:
WikiLeaks
 @wikileaks
5 Apr 2021
11 years ago today WikiLeaks published Collateral Murder. It was a defining moment in our understanding of the Iraq war. The publisher, Julian Assange, faces a 175 year sentence for publishing evidence of such crimes, government abuses & corruption collateralmurder.wikileaks.o…
4
Replying to @marwilliamson
The govt IS involved, but not in a way that benefits us.
Replying to @marwilliamson
And why would the powers that be employ weather warfare? Most likely due to the realization that we are running out of resources to support the populations. "The End of More" by Josephine Smit and Norman Pagett spells it out.
Load more