To all the materialists who think the incredible designs of nature - including on fish, birds, flowers and even caterpillars - emerge from nothing more than the most reductionist scientific evolutionary forces, I joyously disagree with you.
177
136
88
1,697
I shouldn’t have used the word “reductionist” that way. The people criticizing me on that one are right. My bad. Sorry.

Apr 5, 2021 · 4:35 AM UTC

26
7
1
385
Replying to @marwilliamson
MDubz, you have more character than this. Out of anyone, YOU are supposed to know who you are. This is way too late in the game for you to be apologizing for things you very clearly did intentionally. Own it or get out of my sphere of influence. I let you in, I can let you out.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Omg
Replying to @marwilliamson
Forgiven 😘 We 💕 you
Replying to @marwilliamson
??????
Replying to @marwilliamson
There's nothing wrong with calling reductionism reductionism. It's just a matter of the social price you'll have to pay. The times I've received painful truths have been the most valuable to me.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Way to go. Celebrating your ignorance.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Tbh “materialists” was worse. Really pigeon-holing the complexity of the human relationships with science, spirituality, and the journey we are all on in understanding this existence.
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Don’t worry about that. 🙏🏻💐✨🌐🤗
Replying to @marwilliamson
Should have used reparations anchor.fm/jo-blo/episodes/Bu…

Buck dancing for biden by Don't Hate The Truth

Unfortunately black people still want to have a pat on top of the head we're still politically immature we trade one races for the next with some fake black women at that but dancing forbidden does...

podcasters.spotify.com
Load more