To all the materialists who think the incredible designs of nature - including on fish, birds, flowers and even caterpillars - emerge from nothing more than the most reductionist scientific evolutionary forces, I joyously disagree with you.

Apr 5, 2021 · 4:04 AM UTC

177
136
88
1,697
I shouldn’t have used the word “reductionist” that way. The people criticizing me on that one are right. My bad. Sorry.
26
7
1
385
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
The products of bad "design" end up not existing anymore. Lots of barren unhabitable planets, dead species, deformed babies and life, etc. The "incredible design" exists because it works.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I believe I know how you meant that though, it can seem like a lot to overlook, to some of us. Both points exhibit the wonder of nature, in some pretty remarkable ways, to me. 🌱
Replying to @marwilliamson
YES, WATCH AN ANT IF YOU WANT TO SEE THE MIND OF GOD
Replying to @marwilliamson
I wonder if your view of anthropogenically driven climate change is as anti-scientific. Not looking for an argument bc evolution theory is about as settled as science gets.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Intelligent design
Replying to @marwilliamson
You know you're a lunatic right?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Nothing is created nothing is lost everything is constantly transformed, we are only limited by our sense perceptions which are also constantly changing.
Replying to @marwilliamson
You are wrong, but at least you feel good about it!
Replying to @marwilliamson
You’re disagreeing with science, not materialists. The great thing about science is it doesn’t really matter if you agree with it or not. It’s the truth either way. Put down the fairy tales and educate yourself with some Darwin.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Billions of years worth of mutations and still happening right now.
Load more