To all the materialists who think the incredible designs of nature - including on fish, birds, flowers and even caterpillars - emerge from nothing more than the most reductionist scientific evolutionary forces, I joyously disagree with you.

Apr 5, 2021 · 4:04 AM UTC

177
136
88
1,697
I shouldn’t have used the word “reductionist” that way. The people criticizing me on that one are right. My bad. Sorry.
26
7
1
385
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Fractal geometry
Replying to @marwilliamson
The blood supply to your retinas passes over the photosensitive surface
Replying to @marwilliamson
Hi, fabulous orb candidate, please read some more science.
Replying to @marwilliamson
The universe is governed by natural laws. Math, physics, and chemistry. No creator necessary.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Gonna have to respectfully disagree.
Replying to @marwilliamson
lol
Replying to @marwilliamson
Reductionist as in "̵m̵e̵r̵e̵l̵y̵ ̵f̵o̵r̵ ̵s̵u̵r̵v̵i̵v̵a̵l̵" "merely that which happens to propagate?" Maybe it's a lot more complicated than we know, even involving quantum superstates in DNA that collapse from blah blah, but it would still boil down all the same, wouldn't it?
Replying to @marwilliamson
And what exactly is the alternative?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Science is reductionist?
Load more