To all the materialists who think the incredible designs of nature - including on fish, birds, flowers and even caterpillars - emerge from nothing more than the most reductionist scientific evolutionary forces, I joyously disagree with you.

Apr 5, 2021 · 4:04 AM UTC

177
136
88
1,697
I shouldn’t have used the word “reductionist” that way. The people criticizing me on that one are right. My bad. Sorry.
26
7
1
385
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
Okay where's the evidence. Besides look at the trees.
Replying to @marwilliamson
That's okay. 🙂
Replying to @marwilliamson
youtube.com/xVOnBOE4QBc
Replying to @marwilliamson
For me, the sensible position on the big existential questions is, "I don't know, and I'm comfortable with that." The problem is with the believers who insist on forcing their view on the rest of us.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Read some of @RichardDawkins books. I liked you so far, but this is anti-scientific nonsense.
Replying to @marwilliamson
I believe there is nothing more than nature but it is all love and creativity that creates these things nothing less
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
ok ma’am
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Just because you find natural phenomena aesthetically pleasing doesn't mean it has a super natural cause, and I don't see why you have to disrespect people who don't share your beliefs.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
all that beauty is created by nature, and i think that’s beautiful. that all the tiny changes across millions of years created the beautiful natural world we live in is amazing. i think that it’s important to acknowledge that even if everything was created by evolution that’s not
1
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
As a genetically disabled biologist, lemme tell you, the randomized parts are right out in the open I promise.
1
Load more