To all the materialists who think the incredible designs of nature - including on fish, birds, flowers and even caterpillars - emerge from nothing more than the most reductionist scientific evolutionary forces, I joyously disagree with you.

Apr 5, 2021 · 4:04 AM UTC

177
136
88
1,697
I shouldn’t have used the word “reductionist” that way. The people criticizing me on that one are right. My bad. Sorry.
26
7
1
385
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
It would be deeply unfascinating for one sky-man to make all things exist, instead of the sum total of all scientific observation. Unless you believe those can co-exist, in which case we're only picking between the sky-man and a big bang, which is also an uninteresting decision.
1
This tweet is unavailable
They were two different families.
1
3
This tweet is unavailable
I don’t think science is antithetical to religion at all. But “Spend more time supporting nature?” What does that even mean? The environmental crisis by the way derives much less from lack of study of nature & much more from the fact that not enough people stand in awe before it.
7
5
3
102
more replies
Load more