Some aspects of HR1 & For the People Act desperately needed, but the part about bolstering the 2- party duopoly and making it harder for third-party presidential candidates is not OK. The 2-party system should not have a monopoly on presidential elections. peoplesparty.org/response-hr…

Mar 29, 2021 Β· 5:06 AM UTC

25
47
3
208
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
While HR1 has some good provisions Nancy and Chuck want to prolong the corporate power over our electoral system. Pressure them to take out the garbage and make the bill readable for ordinary people. #PhonyAct
Replying to @marwilliamson
TOTALLY NOT OKAY. Thanks for putting a spotlight on it.
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
agreed of were to make elections easier to vote we must make it easier to run. giving no party an advantage
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
A 2-party system should not have a monopoly on ANY ELECTION. Third parties need to be in all races, not just President.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Its a poison pill more designed to kill 3rd parties w/ some voting rights provisions people will take notice of IMO.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
I heard about that crock of crap!
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
In turn Both Parties are Right-wing, and not of anything left what so ever, because we know the White Supremacy Hate Group controlled GOP and the #ReaganDemocrats, #WarDemocrats & #Dixiecrats controlled #CentristDemocrats are still Right-wing, and a #DumpsterFire...
GIF
Replying to @marwilliamson
You will never get a third party in this country. Never. Never. So we either make it safe for Democrats to get elected or Republicans will completely take over.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Before there was a People’s Party, there was β€˜Draft Bernie.’ But Bernie knew how hard it is to form a 3rd party in America, so he worked with Democrats in the 2016 elections. Jane has expressed interest in a 3rd party, too.
Load more