Republicans have now introduced 253 new voter suppression laws in 43 states. Voter suppression is a direct attack on our democracy and we MUST stand up to it. We need the #JohnLewisVotingRightsAct & For the People Act. rollcall.com/2021/03/02/why-…

Mar 8, 2021 · 1:33 PM UTC

24
99
3
381
Replying to @marwilliamson
The Republicans are disgraceful ... they will do anything to win ... anything to prevent minorities from voting ... and they simply call it protecting against voter fraud ... When the only people that have been charged with voter fraud ... are Republicans.
Replying to @marwilliamson
“Voter suppression laws” What a 🤡 Is it alcohol suppression to show I’d to purchase alcohol? Driving suppression to have to geta DL? Flying suppression to show it to get on a plane? Gun suppression to show ID to buy a gun?
Replying to @marwilliamson
HR1 destroys any chance of a third party and fortifies our two party tyranny. I also heard it criminalizes progressivism.
7
Replying to @marwilliamson
They’re not suppression laws. Can you just please show ID at least!? Oh no then some minorities can’t vote cause they don’t have ID , that’s just as racist as saying they don’t know how to get online. Fix the election problem first. It wasn’t secure and you know it.
Replying to @marwilliamson
And the dems screw 3rd parties with HR1. I don’t want to hear another thing about republicans from so called progressives. Dems are having progressive leftists censored. Dems just screwed workers AGAIN. More kids in cages. The list is long but yeah repubs.
Replying to @marwilliamson
Meanwhile dems are pushing HR1 and trying to squash 3rd parties.
3
Replying to @marwilliamson
Would seem HR1 is partly another kind of vote suppression, despite its otherwise good intentions. It opens dark money floodgates, plus makes it more difficult for 3rd parties. So we who wish to break the 2-party stranglehold are faced with, yes, voter suppression.
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
I thought you wanted to have a viable third party? You know that HR1 will make that virtually impossible, right? Voter suppression IS a direct attack on our democracy, but more voter suppression is not the answer.
1
13
Replying to @marwilliamson
Voter suppression... You mean requiring proof of eligibility? Secure chain of custody for ballots?
1
1
7
Replying to @marwilliamson
At a time when Americans are fed up with the two party system, they want to pass a bill that would destroy any third party that even attempts to run. They want to be able to corrupt politicians even more? They know what they are doing.
1