With the overriding need to get rid of a neofascist would-be dictator, we hoped the centrist Democrat in question would be as progressive as the Dem platform suggested he might be. Everyone has their own point at which they’re ready to shout loudly that he’s not. My point is now.
182
248
40
1,683
Before the voting took place would have been infinitely more useful than now.
2
44
Replying to @PoliticalJudo
I would still vote for him again. And he’s still infinitely better than a second Trump term.

Mar 4, 2021 · 7:15 PM UTC

41
1
3
59
I’m in survival mode & I look at it like this (as do millions): Trump: $2900 (I have a dependent child) Biden: $0 Both bombed the ME & caged kids at the border, neither would give healthcare or forgive student loans... Only difference I see is media giving one a complete pass
2
2
20
“Infinitely” seems a bit strong of a term. There’s a good argument for another Trump term - under Biden, brunch libs go back to sleep while Biden pursues the same policies or worse, but w/woke language and an intersectional cabinet.
3
Wrong. He's infinitely worse as he sweeps the same corporatist authoritarianism back under the rug where privileged neoprogs can pretend it doesn't exist. Or is "not as bad". You lie to yourself, which is one thing. But you are actively lying to others about him to save face.
3
😂 omg you’re so clownish.
Watch as Trump gets 9 more years 🥰
Should have spoken out in the primaries. We had a chance to get someone else but no one had the courage to call out the rigging for a SECOND time.
5
You are the problem.
6
Replying to @marwilliamson
Howie Hawkins was running and infinitely better than both. You’re still stuck right where the Dems want you.
3
19
Anyone who disagrees either isn't considering all the covid deaths that aren't occurring because Trump's no longer in office or, God help us, they don't care.
1