So how many people do you think are going to die because Americans wanted to watch a ball game? #SuperSpreaderBowl
626
770
129
5,875
Replying to @transastro
Protecting the vulnerable would’ve meant canceling the game.

Feb 8, 2021 · 6:08 AM UTC

25
5
2
215
You’re not missing anything. Money and profits over people’s lives. That’s the United States Of Corporations. Reality sucks. Many sociopaths are CEO’s and work in government.
1
3
YES. However NONE of our leaders, including Trump or Biden give a damn. Both of them put the economy ahead of our lives. You, of course said we should vote for Biden because the Dems gave a shit,
The vulnerable should stay at home. Period. Healthy people should be enjoying life. As per China study including 900,000 people, no asymptomatic spread. You are such a disappointment to me.
1
If you believe the propaganda...this is not a pandemic. This is a new system being rolled out...open your eyes Marianne.
1
256 games played by the nfl this year. Where the link to all the deaths?
ShUt DoWn AlL bUSiNeSsEs UnTiL pEoPlE nEvEr DiE aGaIn. You statists are cult members who don't take personal responsibility for your lives. Or Big Pharma owns your Truth and you lack the courage to speak it.
Scared &/or Vulnerable people should stay home. Don't impose or demand the 99% to sacrifice their life so you can feel safe. #fearmongering #scamdemic #oppression
3
Shut up, those who are vulnerable and chose to go to the game have themselves to blame.
Protecting the vulnerable would have meant that the vulnerable stay quarantined, not canceling an entire event. Your comments makes zero sense.
1
This tweet is unavailable
I don’t understand why. There are countries who dealt with Covid very differently and now are basically past it. They showed restraint and discipline while they needed to. What am I missing?
14
2
1
108