nitter
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
3 Feb 2021
There isn’t one.
Rep. Ro Khanna
@RepRoKhanna
3 Feb 2021
I have yet to hear a single coherent argument for how our economy will suffer if we give people $2,000 checks.
Feb 3, 2021 · 5:47 PM UTC
42
304
6
3,080
Load newest
Skeleton Ghoulie©
@SkeletonGhoulie
3 Feb 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
Off subject. Disney marianne
sapienverity
@sapienverity
4 Feb 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
@ninaturner
@TheDemocrats
control all branches, what is your explanation?
Happy Face
@theHappyFace_
4 Feb 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
I like how these politicians take money from lobbyists but won’t give money to people.
F
@FrankieFriday98
3 Feb 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
Because it'll be less helpful than $8000 checks.
Matt- SOS 🇵🇪, Nueva Constitución ya!
@MangerLesRiches
4 Feb 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
@ninaturner
They'll realize it won't harm the economy which means that underpaid workers will the ask for a seat on the table. They can't have that, they'll rather have us die than forfeit an inch to that idea.
The Sarcastigator
@GoodExplain
3 Feb 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
Yes! The US can spend unlimited money it doesn't have with no consequences!
Lori Evangelisto
@rannie2dogs
4 Feb 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
The money goes back into the economy!!!
#StimulusChecks2000
Steve Clifford hates Mo Bamba
@SteveSm88084930
3 Feb 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
Especially in a consumption driven economy, juxtaposed to a manufacturing one like China.
Silence of the Dems 🇵🇸🐼🇸🇻
@dennis_reichel
3 Feb 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
"Stonks"
🐘🐻🐺Ken🐋🐬🐧
@LondoMollari13
4 Feb 2021
Replying to
@marwilliamson
@ninaturner
it's not about right/reason, it's about doing as little as possible 2 keep pressure on people 2 WORK IN DEADLY conditions 2 make RICH people RICHER.
Load more