Warren's #WealthTax plan calls for 2% over $500M, 1% more for over $1 billion. No one at that level of wealth would see any difference whatsoever in their lifestyle, but millions of people would see a fundamental difference in their lives based on what we could do with the money.

Jan 29, 2021 · 8:00 PM UTC

232
1,115
67
7,624
Correction: her plan is for 2% over $50M, not $500M.
22
45
2
660
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson
? fools
Replying to @marwilliamson
Yes, I think that the Democrats need to run a platform that highlights that. Big difference between someone that makes a million and someone that makes 500 million. Things are going to hit a boiling point when it comes to the growing wealth gap if shit doesn’t change.
Replying to @marwilliamson
nitter.vloup.ch/raadiating/statu…
2
Replying to @marwilliamson
Dumb. We do not need the rich to pay for programs at the federal level. Taxes don't fund federal spending. Warren is lying to your face, and you celebrating, what a joke. Stop perpetuating Neoliberal Propaganda. Taxes don't fund federal spending. youtube.com/Q1SMjeuyF-Y

Stephanie Kelton -The Angry Birds Approach to Understanding Deficits...

Stephanie Kelton -The Angry Birds Approach to Understanding Deficits in the Modern Economy. Dr. Kelton clears up the misinformation on Fed Deficits being t...

youtube.com
Replying to @marwilliamson
Bernie's wealth tax is better; starts @ a lower amount, has more brackets, has higher taxes at the top (up to 8 cents instead of 2). Any1 who believed the propaganda that Warren had "a plan for that' while Bernie wanted a pony helped keep this corrupt, unequal system in place.
3
5
1
12
Replying to @marwilliamson
Isn't that what Bezos makes in a day?
Replying to @marwilliamson @BootsnMary
Elizabeth ("Im acapitalist to my bones") Warren should be ashamed to ever again show her (two)faces in public She contrived to publicly ensnare/denigrate Bernie for her own squalid political gain
Replying to @marwilliamson
💯
Replying to @marwilliamson
And those percentages could honestly be higher, on lower income levels... but it’s a good start 💁🏻
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
It should be much higher and at a lower income.
Load more