The idea that disagreeing with an elected official means you’re being “disruptive” is preposterous in a democracy. The idea that you have to go along with the party line in a non-election season “for the sake of unity” is ridiculous. Fundamental pattern disruption is called for.

Dec 28, 2020 · 2:25 PM UTC

50
263
20
1,563
Load newest
Replying to @marwilliamson @AvalonDelaney
Don’t give up speaking truth
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Only in a "non-election season"?
Replying to @marwilliamson
Agreed. Here's the thing though. Theres no evidence that complaining on social media to or about politicians changes their voting on public policy, at all. There is evidence they only listen to top donors views. So how do we best use this platform to help each other create power?
Replying to @marwilliamson @SherryWelch2020
Hell, I go against the party line in an election season TOO! Why the hell wouldn't you do that.
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Holding our elected officials accountable, especially the men & women you (me) voted into office, is an important function of democracy. Blind allegiance to any political party is dangerous.
4
Replying to @marwilliamson @llchase
Pathetic Apologist More Spin
Replying to @marwilliamson
All she said and #ForceTheVote
Replying to @marwilliamson
We should NEVER go along with the party line, even in an election season. We should always go along with our own conscience. If the Dem Party does not and cannot attend to the needs of the people, they should NEVER expect our support. #DemExit
2
Replying to @marwilliamson @debostic
Shut up you lost loser. Biden won he can do what he wants.
2
1
1
Replying to @marwilliamson
Being disruptive is effective in ensuring things are done right. If a cop asks for your receipts to prove your alibi, you give it to them. The American people want our elected officials receipts, and if they dont have them, we will elect those who will.
Load more